Were There Enslaved People in Brewster?
Yes, there were, and it’s unlikely we’ll ever be able to name them all, but we would like to name the ones we can in an effort to honor their existence and to recognize the wrong done them with their enslavement.
In 1716 Major John Freeman, a large landowner in what is today Brewster, provided in his will ‘freedom for my negroes,” leaving each four acres, a horse, and a cow, and further charging that “I desire my children to put them in such way as they may not want.”
In 1729 Kenelm Winslow’s estate inventory lists a “negro man named Caesar” and his wife and two children, valued at 130 pounds.
That same year Samuel Hall bequeathed his wife Patience [later the second wife of the below-mentioned Thomas Clark] an unnamed “old negro man” and “negro girl.”
The 1754 “Enumeration of Slaves” for the town of Harwich, which until the 1803 separation included today’s Brewster, records eight male and six female slaves.
ENUMERATION OF SLAVES 1754
According to the Order of the General Court we the subscribers have taken an account of the number of the Negroes [sic] Slaves in the Town of Harwich [in 1754 this included Brewster] and find them to be Viz: Eight males and Six females
To the Honorable
Josiah Willard, Sec’try
[signed] Barnaby Freeman
Jabez Snow
(Assessors of Harwich)
A 1755 will written by Thomas Clark, who lived near the grist mill on Stony Brook Road, deeded to his first wife Sarah his “little slave Molly.”
BILL OF SALE SLAVE MOLLY
…I also give unto my wife my little slave Molly…
Benjamin Bangs, whaleman, trader, and diarist, who lived across the street from First Parish Meeting House, recorded in his diary:
December 3, 1747: “Silas Negro given to me this day.”
February 29, 1760: “I had Sarah Negro come here to live. I bought her at 200 pounds old Ten[or].”
December 15, 1760: “I sold my Negro Oliver and very glad to get rid of him for Thirty Nine pounds Law’l Mony to Eleazer Nickerson Bass ponds . . .”
February 19, 1762: “I sold old Amos and Jesse this day.”
Below is the bill of sale for Sarah, purchased for twenty-six pounds thirteen shillings. She had contracted a form of tuberculosis called The King’s Evil, believed to be cured by the touch of royalty. Sarah was sold with a warranty of sorts -- if the disease returned, Bangs’ money would be refunded:
BILL OF SALE SLAVE SARAH
Harwich March 1760
Receiv’d of Benj’n Bangs Twenty-five pounds thirteen shillings and four pence in full Equally between us [illegible] For a Negro Woman Names Sarah Which formerly [belonged?] to Thomas Clark Esq. and his wife Mrs. Patience Clark both deceas’d for consideration whereof we do thereby sell and warrant the said Negro Woman to the said Bangs and his heirs during her life against the claims of any person whatsoever. In witness whereof we [Illegible] set our hand this Eleventh Day of March Anno Domini 1760
Thomas Clark
Seth Clark
In presence of
Roger King
Ebenezer Allen
Harwich March 11th 1760
Whereas we the subscribers having this day sold a negro woman names Sarah to Benj’n Bangs and He has paid us in full and the said negro having some time ago had the King’s Evill [a form of tuberculosis believed cured by the touch of royalty] which is judged now to be cured But in case the said negro should not be cured or have the said distemper upon her within two years from the date as may be judged to be By a Doctor so as to be to the damage of said Bangs we hereby promise to return the sum of 26=13=4 law’l money or to make the damage good as we shall agree witness our hand
In presence of
Roger King
Ebenezer Allen
Thomas Clark
Seth Clark
